You know, it's time to move on.
There's a whole cultural dispensation, you see, that this particular critic would like to dispense with. And that is the "hip" gay play of the 80's and 90's - which tried to cross gay themes with the interests of the largely-heterosexual-female theatre audience. This whole style has by now dragged on too far into the millennium, methinks. It's not 1995 anymore, even New York has gay marriage now, and I'm not Frank Rich. And sure, gay men and straight women are probably the core audience for theatre - but shouldn't we be making theatre for everybody?
Some of these works are worthy of remembrance and revival, it's true - but not all that many; great gay playwrights like Kushner or Williams are basically as rare as great straight ones. (And gay men don't necessarily make better theatre critics, either.) So I think we can throw out most of Craig Lucas, and good chunks of Lanford Wilson and Terrence McNally, and needless to say almost all of Charles Busch. And I'm not crazy anymore about the "gayface" children's theatre perpetrated by the likes of the Gold Dust Orphans and their ilk. It's funny, yes, but it's not cutting edge, and it no longer has any real political traction. It's easily construed as nostalgia, in fact; it's all a little tired. I want something tougher, smarter - something about the way we live now. I mean, you can find more up-to-the-minute portrayals of gay lives on network television now than you can on most local stages. And that's just wrong!

No comments:
Post a Comment